引力波检验了广义相对论吗？
引力波是爱因斯坦根据广义相对论提出来的一个概念。引力波的探测原理也是限定在广义相对论框架内。2016年-2017年间，LIGO探测到了一些频率和振幅（应变）大致单调变化的信号，均将其定义为螺旋双黑洞或螺旋双中子合并的引力波。但经过大量的计算，主振动频率和振幅（应变）最具有单调变化特征的GW150914信号波，不仅不符合广义相对论的引力波方程——Blanchet方程，而且存在着原则性的偏离。LIGO定义了一个低频率近似约束条件取近似，掩盖了这种原则性的偏离。而GW150914信号波的频率分布和变化规律，严格符合用泛量子论推出的方程（这个方程是用Mahtematica推导的，在A4纸上写不下，目前还没有写成论文），无论频率高低，用泛量子论方程计算的波源的质量结果是一样的。但Blanchet频率，用GW150914的不同频率计算结果相差非常大。
详细论证请参阅《引力波的相对论差异》一文，这篇文章前不久翻译成英文，目前在国际TOP期刊审稿，但发表的可能性不大，因为也权威的观点冲突。
以下是论文中英文标题和摘要——
===================================================================
引力波的相对论差异
X. D. Dongfang
The People's Republic of China
摘要：100年前Einstein首次根据广义相对论提出了引力波的概念并预言了引力波的存在, 100年来引力波理论和探测原理也一直在广义相对论的框架内发展. 2015年9月14日美国激光干涉仪引力波天文台探测到了GW150914信号波. 基于由广义相对论Blanchet频率方程的零级近似所估算的啁啾质量等拟合结果, 该信号波被认定为约13亿年前距离地球13亿光年之外的36个和29个太阳质量的黑洞合并成一个62个太阳质量的黑洞时所产生的引力波, Einstein广义相对论的黑洞和引力波等推论因此均被认为得到了检验, 原始信号波也被修正为频率和应变先随时间单调增加然后频率趋于不变而应变急剧减小的数值相对论波形. 这里详细分析了LIGO所探测到的GW150914信号原始波形和数值相对论修正波形的正负应变频率. 精确数值计算和图像解的结果表明, GW150914信号原始波形的正负应变的不同分布的频率的变化率有高精确度的相同变化规律, 表现出与量子数相关的泛量子特性, 广义相对论Blanchet频率方程没有GW150914引力波解; 而由数值相对论拟合的标准相对论波形的频率分布和频率变化率偏离原始波形的很远, 并且也不满足Blanchet频率方程, 数值相对论处理的结果未达到预期目的. 虽然在刚刚过去的不足两年时间内, 观测报告相继宣告确认了共5个来自古远螺旋双星的引力波信号, 但除GW150914外, 另四个信号波GW151226、GW170104、GW170814、GW170817的频率分布和变化却并没有精确的规律而无法进行数值分析. 因此得出结论: GW150914信号波、引力波广义相对论频率方程和引力波的数值相对论波形三者之间互不相容, 而到目前为止所探测到的引力波信号还不能被严格证明支持引力波的广义相对论推论. 然而, 这是否意味着未来探测到的引力波信号也不支持广义相对论的Blanchet推论, 答案目前还不明确.
关键词：GW150914引力波；双黑洞；Lagrange频率折线；Blanchet频率方程
PACS: 04.30.-w, 04.80.Nn, 04.70.-s, 04.70.Bw, 04.60.Bc
中图分类号：P145.8 文献标志码：A
Relativistic Differences of Gravitational Waves
X. D. Dongfang
(The People's Republic of China)
100 years ago, Einstein first proposed the concept of gravitational waves and predicted the existence of gravitational waves according to general relativity. In the past 100 years, the theory of gravitational waves and the principle of exploration have been developed in the framework of general relativity. On September 14, 2015 the United States Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory detected the GW150914 signal wave, and the signal wave was believed to be the gravitational wave generated by the inspiral and merger of a pair of black holes and the ringdown of the resulting single black hole, with the initial black hole masses of 36 solar and 29 solar as well as the final black hole mass of 62 solar, which was about 1.3 billion light years away from Earth about 1.3 billion years ago. The corollaries of Einstein's general relativity, such as black holes and gravitational waves, are therefore considered to have been verified, GW150914 signal wave was also revised to the standard waveform predicted by general relativity for the inspiral and merger of a pair of black holes and the ringdown of the resulting single black hole. Here the original waveform of GW150914 signal and its modified relativistic waveform were re-analyzed in detail. The results of exact numerical calculation and image solution show that the change rate of the frequency distributions of the positive and negative strains of the original GW150914 waveform has the same change law with the high accuracy, displaying the pan-quantization properties related to the quantum number, and Blanchet frequency equation of general relativity does not have any GW150914 gravitational wave solution. Moreover, frequency distribution and frequency change rates of the standard relativistic waveform fitted by the numerical relativity are far away from of the original waveform, and it also does not satisfy the Blanchet frequency equation, so the treatment result of numerical relativity did not achieve the expected purpose. Less than two years have passed in the past, the observational reports had successively announced the confirmation of a total of five gravitational wave signals from the ancient-far spiral binary stars, but except for GW150914, the frequency distributions and changes of the other four signal waves, GW151226, GW170104, GW170814, and GW170817, have no precise laws and cannot be numerically analyzed. It can be concluded that the GW150914 signal wave, the general relativistic Blanchet frequency equation of gravitational wave and the numerically relativistic wave of gravitational waves are incompatible with each other among the three, and the gravitational wave signal detected so far cannot be strictly proved to support the general relativistic inference of gravitational waves. However, does this mean that the gravitational wave signal that will be detected in the future will not also support the Blanchet inference of general relativity? The answer is not yet clear.
Keywords GW150914 gravitational wave; Lagrange frequency broken line; Blanchet frequency equation
PACS 04.30.-w, 04.80.Nn, 04.70.-s, 04.70.Bw, 04.60.Bc.
详细论证请参阅《引力波的相对论差异》一文，这篇文章前不久翻译成英文，目前在国际TOP期刊审稿，但发表的可能性不大，因为也权威的观点冲突。
以下是论文中英文标题和摘要——
===================================================================
引力波的相对论差异
X. D. Dongfang
The People's Republic of China
摘要：100年前Einstein首次根据广义相对论提出了引力波的概念并预言了引力波的存在, 100年来引力波理论和探测原理也一直在广义相对论的框架内发展. 2015年9月14日美国激光干涉仪引力波天文台探测到了GW150914信号波. 基于由广义相对论Blanchet频率方程的零级近似所估算的啁啾质量等拟合结果, 该信号波被认定为约13亿年前距离地球13亿光年之外的36个和29个太阳质量的黑洞合并成一个62个太阳质量的黑洞时所产生的引力波, Einstein广义相对论的黑洞和引力波等推论因此均被认为得到了检验, 原始信号波也被修正为频率和应变先随时间单调增加然后频率趋于不变而应变急剧减小的数值相对论波形. 这里详细分析了LIGO所探测到的GW150914信号原始波形和数值相对论修正波形的正负应变频率. 精确数值计算和图像解的结果表明, GW150914信号原始波形的正负应变的不同分布的频率的变化率有高精确度的相同变化规律, 表现出与量子数相关的泛量子特性, 广义相对论Blanchet频率方程没有GW150914引力波解; 而由数值相对论拟合的标准相对论波形的频率分布和频率变化率偏离原始波形的很远, 并且也不满足Blanchet频率方程, 数值相对论处理的结果未达到预期目的. 虽然在刚刚过去的不足两年时间内, 观测报告相继宣告确认了共5个来自古远螺旋双星的引力波信号, 但除GW150914外, 另四个信号波GW151226、GW170104、GW170814、GW170817的频率分布和变化却并没有精确的规律而无法进行数值分析. 因此得出结论: GW150914信号波、引力波广义相对论频率方程和引力波的数值相对论波形三者之间互不相容, 而到目前为止所探测到的引力波信号还不能被严格证明支持引力波的广义相对论推论. 然而, 这是否意味着未来探测到的引力波信号也不支持广义相对论的Blanchet推论, 答案目前还不明确.
关键词：GW150914引力波；双黑洞；Lagrange频率折线；Blanchet频率方程
PACS: 04.30.-w, 04.80.Nn, 04.70.-s, 04.70.Bw, 04.60.Bc
中图分类号：P145.8 文献标志码：A
Relativistic Differences of Gravitational Waves
X. D. Dongfang
(The People's Republic of China)
100 years ago, Einstein first proposed the concept of gravitational waves and predicted the existence of gravitational waves according to general relativity. In the past 100 years, the theory of gravitational waves and the principle of exploration have been developed in the framework of general relativity. On September 14, 2015 the United States Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory detected the GW150914 signal wave, and the signal wave was believed to be the gravitational wave generated by the inspiral and merger of a pair of black holes and the ringdown of the resulting single black hole, with the initial black hole masses of 36 solar and 29 solar as well as the final black hole mass of 62 solar, which was about 1.3 billion light years away from Earth about 1.3 billion years ago. The corollaries of Einstein's general relativity, such as black holes and gravitational waves, are therefore considered to have been verified, GW150914 signal wave was also revised to the standard waveform predicted by general relativity for the inspiral and merger of a pair of black holes and the ringdown of the resulting single black hole. Here the original waveform of GW150914 signal and its modified relativistic waveform were re-analyzed in detail. The results of exact numerical calculation and image solution show that the change rate of the frequency distributions of the positive and negative strains of the original GW150914 waveform has the same change law with the high accuracy, displaying the pan-quantization properties related to the quantum number, and Blanchet frequency equation of general relativity does not have any GW150914 gravitational wave solution. Moreover, frequency distribution and frequency change rates of the standard relativistic waveform fitted by the numerical relativity are far away from of the original waveform, and it also does not satisfy the Blanchet frequency equation, so the treatment result of numerical relativity did not achieve the expected purpose. Less than two years have passed in the past, the observational reports had successively announced the confirmation of a total of five gravitational wave signals from the ancient-far spiral binary stars, but except for GW150914, the frequency distributions and changes of the other four signal waves, GW151226, GW170104, GW170814, and GW170817, have no precise laws and cannot be numerically analyzed. It can be concluded that the GW150914 signal wave, the general relativistic Blanchet frequency equation of gravitational wave and the numerically relativistic wave of gravitational waves are incompatible with each other among the three, and the gravitational wave signal detected so far cannot be strictly proved to support the general relativistic inference of gravitational waves. However, does this mean that the gravitational wave signal that will be detected in the future will not also support the Blanchet inference of general relativity? The answer is not yet clear.
Keywords GW150914 gravitational wave; Lagrange frequency broken line; Blanchet frequency equation
PACS 04.30.-w, 04.80.Nn, 04.70.-s, 04.70.Bw, 04.60.Bc.